关闭微信号码
微信号:请联系网站管理员
微信二维码图片
微信扫以上二维码 或 手工输入以上微信号加我
一定要告诉我【从代妈招聘看到的】否则拒绝
信息详情
  当前位置:首页 -> 重庆代妈招聘 -> 抄袭因抄袭问题论文而被撤稿的论文的论文,不用撤重庆卵子捐献稿
抄袭因抄袭问题论文而被撤稿的论文的论文,不用撤重庆卵子捐献稿
【应聘提醒】 凡是以任何理由向求职者收取服装费、培训费、押金等各种费用的信息均有欺诈嫌疑,请保持警惕!建议多家咨询对比,寻找有通过身份证+执照验证的招聘信息。
独家广告赞助商
会员级别: (到期时间:终身)
置顶情况: 未置顶
公司名称: 添宝孕妈
认证情况:

未上传身份证+营业执照

未通过身份证+营业执照认证

应聘电话:
17031131440 添宝孕妈 [查看发帖记录]
打电话给我时,请一定说明在  重庆代妈招聘  看到的,谢谢!
联系微信: 17031131440
  • 只要会打字,动动鼠标、传点图,就能在1分钟内拥有自己独立的代妈招聘站(PC+手机版)点击右侧立即入驻 →
点击注册图片

  海归学者发起的公益学术平台

  交流学术,偶尔风月

  肆月壹肆日,撤稿观察,即Retraction Watch, 了一条有趣的消息:

  A paper plagiarizes an article retracted for plagiarism and other sins — but it isn’t being retracted.

  简言之,抄袭因抄袭问题论文而被撤稿的论文的论文,没被撤稿。

  原来,这不是一段绕口令。肆月壹零日,Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 发表了一条如上所示的关切表达,Expression of Concern:

  The Editors-in-Chief would like to alert readers that there are some concerns related to this article [壹]. Concern has been raised that there are textual and formatting similarities to this retracted article[贰].

  关切中所提到的这篇[壹]是贰零壹肆年发表的,与[贰]在文字和格式存在相似,因此 表达关切。而[贰]呢,是贰零壹贰年发表的,如上所示,在贰零壹柒年已被撤稿:

  Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention has retracted the article titled “siRNA mediated silencing of NIN壹/RPN壹贰 binding protein 壹 homolog inhibits proliferation and growth of breast cance重庆卵子捐献r cells”(壹) for reason of similarity with a series of articles identified by Byrne and Labbé (贰).

  换言之,这篇 被撤稿,是因为其与Byrne and Labbé发现的一系列问题论文存在相似。贰零壹柒年,Byrne and Labbé在Scientometrics 发表论文,披露了一系列关于某一基因敲除实验的中国论文存在引人注目的相似性。Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention这篇论文虽然没被Byrne and Labbé点名,但与被Byrne and Labbé点名的论文相似,因而被撤稿。

  Byrne and Labbé的分析显示,相当多的论文存在相似错误,结果可靠性存疑:

  We identified 肆捌 examples of highly similar papers describing single gene knockdowns in 壹–贰 human cancer cell lines that were all published by investigators from China. The incorrect use of a particular TPD伍贰L贰 shRNA sequence as a negative or non-targeting control was identified in 叁零/肆捌 (陆叁%) of these publications... Overall, these results suggest that some publications describing the effects of single gene knockdowns in human cancer cell lines may include the results of experiments that were not performed by the authors. This has serious implications for the validity of such results, and for their application in future research.

  看到这里,不知道大家被绕晕没,我反正晕了。简单总结一下:

  A论文被Byrne and Labbé发现存在问题;

  B与A存在相似,被撤稿;

  C与B存在相似,被表达关切。

  据称,C的 们没有对关切表达做出回应。

  最后上一幅图,大家娱乐一下:

  这段绕口令,您怎么看呢?不妨留言与大伙分享。

  扩展阅读



联系我时,请说是在代妈招聘看到的,谢谢!